Urge Your Member of Congress to Support Free Speech on College Campuses

image of Urge Your Member of Congress to Support Free Speech on College Campuses

A bicameral bill was introduced today in the House and Senate that seeks to restrict criticism of Israel at the expense of our First Amendment protected right to free speech. Introduced by Representatives Peter J. Roskam (R-IL), Ted Deutch (D-FL), Doug Collins (R-GA), and Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), and Senators Tim Scott (R-SC) and Bob Casey (D-PA), the legislation includes an overly broad, political definition of anti-Semitism, which includes criticism of the state of Israel.

Entitled the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2018, the bill does not actually counteract the real, disturbing rise in anti-Semitism but rather focuses on suppressing speech critical ...

A bicameral bill was introduced today in the House and Senate that seeks to restrict criticism of Israel at the expense of our First Amendment protected right to free speech. Introduced by Representatives Peter J. Roskam (R-IL), Ted Deutch (D-FL), Doug Collins (R-GA), and Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), and Senators Tim Scott (R-SC) and Bob Casey (D-PA), the legislation includes an overly broad, political definition of anti-Semitism, which includes criticism of the state of Israel.

Entitled the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2018, the bill does not actually counteract the real, disturbing rise in anti-Semitism but rather focuses on suppressing speech critical of Israel. In relying on a State Department working definition of anti-Semitism that was written for data collection in Europe and never intended for domestic application, the Act conflates political opposition with instances of hate. In misusing this working definition by applying it to the domestic setting of schools and college campuses, the Act seeks to expand the protections afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include criticism of Israel and in so doing, equating criticism of a country with anti-Semitism. The author of the working definition utilized in this legislation went on record in 2016 explaining that he believed this approach to be an “affront to academic freedom,” and “unconstitutional and unwise.”

In addition to not actually addressing anti-Semitism, the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2018 should be opposed (blog) because it is unconstitutional, amounts to viewpoint discrimination, and misappropriates a non-legally binding definition for the basis of legal prohibitions. At a time when hate crimes against targeted and vulnerable communities have increased, including against the American Jewish community, it is imperative that our elected officials do not conflate criticisms of policies and political opposition with instances of hate.

Please call and e-mail your member of Congress and urge them to oppose the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act and support free speech.

+

Please Protect Free Speech on Our College Campuses

Find your local rep

Compose your email

Subject:

Dear Member of Congress,
 
As a concerned constituent, I urge you to oppose the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. This bill uses a working definition of anti-Semitism from the State Department, written exclusively for data collection in Europe, and applies it in domestic settings of schools and college campuses. It seeks to expand the definition of Title VI protections to include criticism of Israel. This would threaten free speech.
 
At a time when hate crimes against targeted and vulnerable communities have increased, it is imperative that our elected officials do not conflate criticisms of policies and political opposition with instances of hate. I fear this legislation will do more harm than good. An author of the working-definition, Mr. Kenneth Stern, expressed concern over applying the definition in educational settings as the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act does and said it would be an “affront to academic freedom,” not to mention “unconstitutional and unwise.” 
 
We must counteract hate in all its forms, including anti-Semitism. Unfortunately, the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act does not do that and I respectfully urge you to oppose legislation that would harm our First Amendment rights.

How we use the data you enter on this form

Do Gooder (the advocacy platform powering this online action) processes personal information from you that you enter on this form so that we can provide the functions and related services to you and The Campaigner (the organisation responsible for this online action) for their legitimate purposes, including possibly exporting it to other systems, and to effectively respond to enquiries and communications related to those services.

Specifically when you enter:

Your location data (residential address or postcode) it is used to locate your elected representative, to pre-populate your email signature and to provide The Campaigner with a visualisation of the location of the support for this campaign.
All other data you may enter, including your email address, name, telephone number, commentary and so on is used by The Campaigner to advocate for the campaign’s goals and where required may be sent to the target of the campaign.

The data collected by Do Gooder is also used by us in aggregate form to improve the service and may be held on your behalf outside your country of residence by our third party service providers. These providers are bound by contract to only use personal information on our behalf, in accordance with agreed terms. While the privacy laws of the country in which personal information is stored or transferred may be different from those in your country, we will always have safeguards in place when storing or transferring personal information. We will never sell, rent, loan or in any other way pass your information on to other parties other than to provide this service to you and The Campaigner.

The personal information collected by Do Gooder is held subject to a Data Processing Agreement between Do Gooder and The Campaigner in compliance with the EU's GDPR and Australian law.

Learn more about our privacy policy here

How is my data used?